Why does it say Moshe was "maasrah" to Yehoshua rather than Yehoshua received like Moshe?

The choice stating that Moshe was "maasrah" to Yehoshua emphasizes the importance of teacher effort because it signifies an active transmission of knowledge and responsibility from one leader to another. This verb implies a deliberate action taken by Moshe, reflecting the seriousness and intentionality behind passing on the Torah and leadership duties.

This process is not merely about receiving knowledge but acknowledges the critical effort involved in educating and nurturing the next leader. By using the term "maasrah," it clarifies that Yehoshua's role as a successor is built upon the foundation laid by Moshe, showcasing how much teachers invest in their students. This further highlights the value placed on the mentor-mentee relationship and the effort required to teach and learn effectively.

The other choices do not align as closely with this thematic understanding. They either misinterpret the interaction between Moshe and Yehoshua or shift focus to aspects like authority or respect, which are less relevant to the concept of teacher effort specifically.