Under what condition might Turkey be considered permissible to eat despite the lack of Mesorah?

The correct answer is based on the concept of "Mesorah," which refers to the tradition of how a particular animal or food has been validated as kosher through the generations. In this case, the idea that turkey might be considered permissible if it was initially thought to be from India, which aligns with the earlier understanding of birds and their kosher status, points to an important aspect of Halachic reasoning.

Historically, certain animals were categorized as kosher or non-kosher based on their geographical origins and the knowledge available at the time. If turkeys were considered kosher due to being categorized with other kosher birds from India, and this misconception led to their consumption without any negative repercussions, it reflects a reliance on historical context and community practices.

This reasoning accommodates the understanding that while turkeys may lack a solid Mesorah, their initial classification as kosher based on mistaken geographic origin can still allow for leniency in their consumption. Thus, this option supports the idea that tradition and historical dietary practices can provide a basis for kosher laws, even in the absence of a clear lineage.

In contrast, considerations regarding predator status or traditional enjoyment do not directly address the principles of kosher law and its dependence on established traditions and classifications. Similarly, the historical consumption of